harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vasily Levchenko" <vasily.v.levche...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing scheduling
Date Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:26:13 GMT
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Alexey Petrenko <
alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:

> Vasily,
>
> what is the exact deadline for you to have new Harmony build?
> Can you use one of the regular snapshots (not milestone build)?
> http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/


I afraid that Eclipse IP review procedure require some milestone build.


> <http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/snapshots/>
>
> As far as I remember we spend about a week for milestone build testing.
> However, I believe that we will try to help you since Eclipse is our
> best friend :)


Note that we need  some special build with additional requirements to
verifier-ext.lib.

>
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> 2008/4/11, Vasily Levchenko <vasily.v.levchenko@gmail.com>:
> > Hello folks,
> >  Recently I and some Eclipse folks have finished prototyping java 6
> support
> >  for Eclipse/TPTP project using Harmony verifier for recalculation stack
> map
> >  tables after instrumentation, thanks to Mikhail Loenko to realize our
> >  requirements to extend verifier functionality. Unfortunately extended
> >  functionality wasn't included  in M5 release  of HDK, so we're in
> position
> >  when we need some official snapshot (intermediate release), because of
> some
> >  difference in releasing cycles between Eclipse and Harmony. Actually we
> have
> >  less then couple of weeks to launch legal review for binary
> contribution of
> >  Harmony verifier in Eclipse CVS.
> >
> >  Additionally:
> >  Eclipse have some ABI limitation for native code: Windows all code is
> >  compiled with VC6, here I expect some incompatibility with Harmony
> binaries,
> >  for Linux all sources are compiled gcc 2.96.
> >  We're also interested that
> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5706 (introducing "C"
> >  interface) will be on the trunk.
> >
> >  So the question  is:  is it possible to make special unscheduled but
> >  official release to meet Eclipse legal and ABI requirements?
> >
> > --
> >  --vvl
> >
>



-- 
--vvl

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message