Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vmzakhar@gmail.com designates
 216.239.58.189 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=nY8YzfaqfdIIoTOBIaAC4OkuUvWkTTYacmVR6l0OPJMpoQ1oesK+uJf0+1qV7ykdSB5I4LxwUsgv2l8CXoEb7u42Mbh2DQWw7bx9TIXWZP42U05EK0RMmzvUnTRqDTVwKCjPY204bLE1YevD0EuEYx4Y6cB3lZZDhKshRDj5yEE=
Message-ID: <bd849a5d0803310710g34a67e92g63c427829b2a58c2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:10:07 +0400
From: "Vasily Zakharov" <vmz@apache.org>
Sender: vmzakhar@gmail.com
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: Moving to a newer Yoko?
In-Reply-To: <3b3f27c60803310703v25671427md5c5fcadd7cf836e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <bd849a5d0803280755i3041f8bfl206926a60e2ec57a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47ED67B0.6020701@gmail.com>
	 <bd849a5d0803281512y53c9f050x65930e53b7473883@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47EEAC88.5030905@gmail.com>
	 <bd849a5d0803310651o525e7c32keace1e42760a6ada@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3b3f27c60803310703v25671427md5c5fcadd7cf836e@mail.gmail.com>

I think it's preferable because it saves us the effort of building
Yoko each time Harmony is built.

I mean using a particular snapshot.

The repository we've been downloading Yoko previously [1] only
contains a single 1.0-SNAPSHOT, 1.0-20080304.
And that's the one I've updated the dependencies to.

Vasily

[1] http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/yoko/


On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Nathan Beyer <nbeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why is that preferable? SNAPSHOTs change without notice, so the build
>  could just break on any given day.
>
>  On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Vasily Zakharov <vmz@apache.org> wrote:
>  > Rick McGuire at geronimo-dev suggested to either pull down the
>  >  1.0-SNAPSHOT version from
>  >  the central repositories, or do what Geronimo does and build a
>  >  released from a known repository level.
>  >  I think using the snapshot is preferable for us. I've just committed
>  >  the necessary changes as r642988.
>  >
>  >  Vasily
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  >
>  >  > Vasily Zakharov wrote:
>  >  >  >>> The question is, which Yoko release should we move to?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >> Maybe ping the Geronimo list (the new home of Yoko) to figure out
>  >  >  >> what they have got now if you can't tell from the downloads.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  > We could take the Yoko version used in the latest Geronimo release, do
>  >  >  > you mean that?
>  >  >
>  >  >  No, I actually meant that when Yoko moved under the Geronimo project we
>  >  >  explicitly asked that they make separate downloads available for us to
>  >  >  pick up and use in Harmony.  Hopefully that happened (but I don't see it
>  >  >  after a brief wander around their project website).
>  >  >
>  >  >  So ping the dev list to see where we can get the latest Yoko downloads.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Regards,
>  >  >  Tim
>  >  >
>  >
>