Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3759 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2008 19:31:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2008 19:31:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 98922 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2008 19:30:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 98881 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2008 19:30:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 98851 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2008 19:30:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:30:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of okko73313@gmail.com designates 216.239.58.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.58.190] (HELO gv-out-0910.google.com) (216.239.58.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 19:30:19 +0000 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id r4so524399gve.22 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=PExDRcw9dlTXQcLYHhvE1boE57RnpKgTWkhef61vqac=; b=aOXK2mhk/5YVKQa9YZL4cNl7sVnJn5nSd7W6vcXqB2/NdZ4KXw6Ptk2DE2V+reGlPJY0mIt+xWi0AotQWOdZWC7Gpibzf3ky6sGjvyrZf0vhj2K+nmCdqAyn1K2A5hzBhVaO3jKGm+Aq31M4tOKQLw+d3KRIeNyU+kUmKZF07EY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=sA5jyrj9A6Ym9hVaQL4bWjB2K7VWdIvfpvbKmf4zDndwiDTczeOcskDy2UJdHxrVRnkREqokdAv6jBUxe1YratUsdc3r2bkPP08PxQiztABkoSuRs86tOVCb4F051svZlKNHfNkQ+HswjbrojsyI7z4usb7i8H0dxxOkkG9gxpE= Received: by 10.115.111.1 with SMTP id o1mr12456131wam.87.1206387026079; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.75.7 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2008 12:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <884d1faa0803241230w773ca9c1g289b9d1b9ee778c7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:30:26 +0600 From: "Okonechnikov Konstantin" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] GSoC 2008 Refactor Java Bytecode Translator In-Reply-To: <0vqd4pmj3z3.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4314_31774579.1206387026074" References: <884d1faa0803192322o7b9f58dfja181970fbe2f882e@mail.gmail.com> <0vqzlst35if.fsf@gmail.com> <884d1faa0803201015v2eaad165x6b83b473325e0417@mail.gmail.com> <0vqlk4cih95.fsf@gmail.com> <0vqhcf0iayb.fsf@gmail.com> <884d1faa0803210926s59fbabadr5116c769a794257c@mail.gmail.com> <0vqd4pmj3z3.fsf@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_4314_31774579.1206387026074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline If we need to exclude simplification from IRBuilder, is it OK to use it? I mean IRBuilder should be only modified or this functionality should be written from scratch? And one more question: is there any specification of HIR, HIR <-> Java bytecode correspondence? ------=_Part_4314_31774579.1206387026074--