Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85741 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2008 15:24:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2008 15:24:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 24327 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 15:24:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 24301 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2008 15:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 24292 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2008 15:24:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:24:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.170] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:23:19 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so341901ugc.3 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:22:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I7L3B7K1EqEmEk4KtUkmmXDJCAqhzPpR7Dk2SobnMcg=; b=o3s0dUl1w+Gcyrayo7NSsWQze4AAMUX0p2TZdRfD7cjWozQcfZ1Km9Ix10mgUJ7oQBCa7Qu8hQEus8XMvTm6PkrsgtotxHIMPrESB6VIBOk3iwwjIgXeltIDGUj+r5Ps0+PAkBCgk6JDzwPMjS4VMiKBWpvKq9gHYP5d8T1GiUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oVEzTEy6dLs3I+J467Jp31F4cNiQ8+vfnnPNZxhvfG2F3amWb5vX2V439Su4VgObPWT1QcwFTesOKZDcT7VxGoJWE8bVgxSbi6qevZC8h9O7GCaItTwneRZD8FoYijnAMQMJsidL0qAerbus9bmsChZKpir1WOrq7wqllfEIaq4= Received: by 10.78.203.20 with SMTP id a20mr4739930hug.9.1206631317845; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.5? ( [86.111.176.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm648721nfv.34.2008.03.27.08.21.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47EBBB90.1070106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:21:52 +0000 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: Changing default federated build target Was: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-5521) [build] fix incremental federated build References: <47EBB91F.2040405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alexei Fedotov wrote: > Tim, I renamed "build-all" to "build" to follow this pattern. It was > Geir who addded "clean" target long time ago. Do you want "rebuild" > target to be added? That would suit me (the target names I have become used to using) and would be consistent. Thanks. Tim > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Tim Ellison wrote: >> FWIW the names used in the classlib level build script are: >> >> build - default target, does an incremental build >> clean - as you would expect >> rebuild - clean followed by build >> ... >> >> Maybe it would be good to be consistent with the names here. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> Alexei Fedotov wrote: >> > Tim wrote in HARMONY-5521: >> >> Why not make the incremental build the default? This is more likely the one people will be using daily. >> > >> > We should ask people who are in charge of snapshot creation since they >> > probably use a default target for their script now. It might be good >> > to rename the "default" target into "all" or something because it >> > would not be conventional to call it "default" any longer. This is >> > done via incremental_build_1.patch [2]. Stepan, Alexey, what do you >> > about Tim's suggestion and the patch? >> > >> > The following step would be to do something about class library >> > natives which are rebuilt each time. >> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5521 >> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12378724/incremental_build_1.patch >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Tim Ellison (JIRA) wrote: >> >> >> >> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12582662#action_12582662 ] >> >> >> >> Tim Ellison commented on HARMONY-5521: >> >> -------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> Why not make the incremental build the default? This is more likely the one people will be using daily. >> >> >> >> >> >> > [build] fix incremental federated build >> >> > --------------------------------------- >> >> > >> >> > Key: HARMONY-5521 >> >> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5521 >> >> > Project: Harmony >> >> > Issue Type: Improvement >> >> > Components: build - test - ci >> >> > Reporter: Alexei Fedotov >> >> > Assignee: Pavel Pervov >> >> > Attachments: incremental_build.patch >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > This is a patch which enables incremental Harmony build via conventional federated build option "build". Testing changes. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> This message is automatically generated by JIRA. >> >> - >> >> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > >