harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][archive] drop signtool support
Date Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:41:28 GMT
Stepan, all,
Thanks for your suggestions. I have slightly fixed the code and
believe the support removal may wait for better times.

Alexey,
I've noticed your venture for plug-ins. If you occasionally encounter
a signtool-signed applet, please keep it for testing purposes.

Thanks!

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Stepan Mishura
<stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/29/08, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > 2008/2/29, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
>  > > On 2/28/08, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > > Hello folks,
>  > > >
>  > > > While people seem busy with developing a Netscape plug-in, I wonder
>  > > > what we should do with Netscape signtool support in the archive
>  > > > module. The tool [1] itself seems to be dead, and I cannot check if
>  > > > HARMONY-204 really breaks that support. It seems so from the comment.
>  > > > I suggest either undoing HARMONY-204 changes related to signtool
>  > > > support, or dropping the support completely. Thoughts? References to
a
>  > > > living signtool instance?
>  > >
>  > > Alexei, you most probably right that the tool is not available (at
>  > > least I couldn't find the tool's binaries for download).
>  > We have some jarsigner on jdk_tools. Here is the sources:
>  > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/jdktools/trunk/modules/tools/src/main/java/org/apache/harmony/tools/jarsigner
>  >
>  > > But I'm not quite sure that Harmony shouldn't support jars signed
>  > > by the tool
>  > I would say that Harmony should support signed jars :)
>
>  We are talking about jars signed by Netscape signtool .
>
>  -Stepan.
>
>  >
>  > SY, Alexey
>  >
>



-- 
With best regards,
Alexei

Mime
View raw message