harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jdktools][build] Which is more recommendable build approach for jdwp?
Date Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:04:48 GMT
Thanks very much.

2008/3/5, Ivan Popov <ivan.g.popov@gmail.com>:
> First approach is preferred, because it is aligned with the jdktools
> build structure. You can use "ant -Dbuild.module=jpda build-native" if
> you want to build only JDWP code (as a native part of JPDA module).
> For running JDWP unit tests you can use similar command "ant
> -Dbuild.module=jpda test".
>
> Second approach uses internal targets which require proper
> configuration from top-level build scripts.
>
> Thanks.
> Ivan
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have found that we have two approaches to build jdwp.
> >
> >  1. Through federated build, this will call the make to build jdwp modules.
> >   a) cd <jdktools>
> >   b) ant fetch-depends
> >   c) ant
> >
> >  2. Through jpda module's make directory , this approach will call cc
> >  directly to build jdwp module.
> >   a) cd <jdktools>\modules\jpda\make
> >   b) ant build.jdwp.agent
> >       ant build.jdwp.transport
> >
> >  The first approach works fine, but it seems it does not supply any
> >  test target.(Am i missing something?)
> >
> >  The second approach seems a little outdated,  since the directory
> >  structure is different from current status and it demands some
> >  modifications to work. It contains a target to run the junit test.
> >
> >  I guess the second is the original script before jdktools are included
> >  in federated build. So we should just using the first one?
> >
> >  Best Regards
> >
> >  --
> >  Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
> >  China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>


-- 
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
View raw message