Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.178.250 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=SXVWpFC/WWkhb6W8LaA0Z0hjSqbxMvURDAbzsWLpM8UbVuZH7OK9eCfHORqMtCH5Kh97TvpjaZ2Ap4Spk3MN4IGsGGGcfuHIuypdPAFR8FoqXAhv/zfL64wbFzPgDgFAWXsajsrhLK+Y4ydLzjiJFYyEPGaoMhX0ESfFbyvCKJU=
Message-ID: <c3755b3a0802170224x65cbd1f4n2cad41fd3c86d9c9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:24:14 +0300
From: "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [build] ant utility target to copy working_vm to working_classlib
In-Reply-To: <c30d70960802170116n5f18b58bq162c58d2344d8350@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3b3f27c60802161258k7155e16ah30912357e8071cb5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c30d70960802170116n5f18b58bq162c58d2344d8350@mail.gmail.com>

Current federated build is not suited for every day work. Because it
makes only clean builds and this takes lots of time.

So we should keep possibility to build class library, vm and selected
class library module alone.

SY, Alexey

2008/2/17, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>:
> Nathan, all,
> Copying class library artifacts to the working_vm/ directory is a
> legacy of two component system, isn't it? Now, when we have several
> (three, and will have more) upper level components, it looks
> reasonable to collect the build artifacts at the same upper level. Why
> should not we assemble the build in the target/ dir? May be one should
> add several target directories for different build configurations. I
> believe that the artifact location should not affect class library
> development, we just need to move deploy directories to a common
> place.
>
> What do you think?
>
> On Feb 16, 2008 11:58 PM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
> > I was thinking that we could use a utility target in the top-level
> > build script that copied the HDK artifacts from the working_vm to the
> > working_classlib, but I'm still catching up with the new DRLVM build.
> > Would copying the 'working_vm/deploy' to the 'working_classlib/deploy'
> > be sufficient?
> >
> > The use for this would be to facilitate class library development, so
> > I want to be able to run the top-level build, copy the HDK artifacts,
> > then move into 'working_classlib' and be able to do cleans, rebuilds
> > and tests.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Alexei
>