Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexei.fedotov@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gV8zoGFVK6MnI6SfGtcnJsVOzl/l1/oYCa0qLr8mGZXO8wJyOlHiJsJhTioWUlh6D5UcNCeU1FfpgvOnIqVHpFnq/H2twIbQNdDE7xs6oANbwVPVnoTvvvzYTNSv15jQ7z8VTBeJkaE8ukgxng6qWuAfSLWSfcnyCh7/IsuPEmM=
Message-ID: <c30d70960802280638g7f1b050ctf015c30ed1461dc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:38:28 +0300
From: "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][archive] drop signtool support
In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0802280139s6e568b3eje754c5e6e2028d6a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c30d70960802271522j39097f69oe10d321b461f920b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0802271940m7aeccd8bq8810e607e51ff3c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <c30d70960802280054n2ce9084dpd5b48f74788d1cc6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0802280139s6e568b3eje754c5e6e2028d6a@mail.gmail.com>

Stepan,
I have added three comments to HARMONY-5555.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Stepan Mishura
<stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/28/08, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Stepan,
>  > Thanks for your interest! May be I was too harsh, and the support was
>  > not broken. The only problem is the FIXME comment itself introduced by
>  > the commit [1] of HARMONY-204.
>
>  OK, now the connection with signtool is clear, thank for clarification!
>
>  Could you also additionally comment HARMONY-5555? From this JIRA
>  description it is not obvious for me what the problem is.
>
>  Thanks,
>  Stepan.
>
>
>
>  >
>  > [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/archive/src/main/java/java/util/jar/JarVerifier.java?r1=384239&r2=391283&pathrev=410562&diff_format=h
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Stepan Mishura
>  > <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > On 2/28/08, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > >  > Hello folks,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > While people seem busy with developing a Netscape plug-in, I wonder
>  > >  > what we should do with Netscape signtool support in the archive
>  > >  > module. The tool [1] itself seems to be dead, and I cannot check if
>  > >  > HARMONY-204 really breaks that support. It seems so from the comment.
>  > >  > I suggest either undoing HARMONY-204 changes related to signtool
>  > >  > support,
>  > >
>  > >  Hi Alexei,
>  > >
>  > >  I don't see any connection between HARMONY-204 and Netscape signtool
>  > >  support - the JIRA (as well the spec.) doesn't mention Netscape tool
>  > >  at all. As I understood HARMONY-204 description and comments - it
>  > >  fixed Harmony bug and align it with the spec. and RI behaviour.
>  > >
>  > >  Could you clarify?
>  > >
>  > >  Thanks,
>  > >  Stepan.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  > or dropping the support completely. Thoughts? References to a
>  > >  > living signtool instance?
>  > >  >
>  > >  > --
>  > >  > With best regards,
>  > >  > Alexei
>  > >  >
>  > >  > [1] http://java.sun.com/products/plugin/1.3/docs/rsa_signing.html
>  > >  >
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  > With best regards,
>  > Alexei
>  >
>


-- 
With best regards,
Alexei