Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65751 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2008 08:27:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2008 08:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 60057 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2008 08:27:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 60024 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2008 08:27:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 60015 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2008 08:27:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:27:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xiaofeng.li@gmail.com designates 216.239.58.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.58.190] (HELO gv-out-0910.google.com) (216.239.58.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 08:27:10 +0000 Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id r4so1090844gve.22 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:27:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FKv/7yi+krUiRgoxRHseASMpTIrRsYuxNcEdPvZf0Bs=; b=GeA3l6f/+/3ABAKMIAXyFU9oV9scLRJtPU0n9GVPWrSsy75G1WhCPkivNPnmd7XppHx7tEqtg3lpPGxqjYrvAoyz7GnshvE5MDnN11OF0j3pJteESug0KScUTEgr00mMkYOmA/dLEfsfn37v2jiXGcveiF3r9cxx3zd35wsY8Lw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jdAaitVeWTpBeRnZQPHRPtYv4KL1ipkgnvLR3v2QLTJDsPKlKacLu/QlDRVFgC+KXfEgECcEoUddT9Kl54Kys+rInJH/fGIrIc6W5baPONQbKEdkuRy0aIsbT/ZVjGPb4zZNewVOjvPS9TYmtvw6xt6LbgCu3RBCZaW5VUcJ9Dc= Received: by 10.150.216.8 with SMTP id o8mr2128666ybg.138.1204100838128; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.147.15 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:27:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9623c9a50802270027n798690d1k440f2b210535c9fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:27:18 +0800 From: "Xiao-Feng Li" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] Declare r629320 as M5 In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0802261955j2106896bl13f95b805f49fb5a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e47b64f0802261955j2106896bl13f95b805f49fb5a@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Stepan Mishura wrote: > Hi, > > The testing cycle for r629320 [1] and test results evaluation [2] have > been completed. > There are some issues that should be fixed but none of them look critical. > Please speak up if you think that a particular issue is a blocker for > M5 and must be fixed. > > So should we declare r629320 build as M5 milestone and unfroze the trunk? > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r629320/index.html > [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200802.mbox/%3c6e47b64f0802212113q5c15aa22k592c8c199db1a001@mail.gmail.com%3e > > Thanks, > Stepan. > -- http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com