harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib]remove the duplicate locale data
Date Sat, 09 Feb 2008 08:42:17 GMT
BTW, I would move this discussion to separate thread to get more
community attention and opinions.

SY, Alexey

2008/2/9, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> 2008/2/7, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
> >
> > On 7 February 2008 at 15:48, "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > 2008/2/6, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>:
> > > > On 2/7/08, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I would suggest to mark these issues as "must be fixed before M5"
> > > > > since Harmony M5 should not be worse then M4.
> > > > Why do you think these differences are so important?
> > > Because these issues are regressions :)
> > Alexey, I don't think that is fair.
> Do not agree with this :)
>
> But
> > Regressions are changes that affect
> > things negatively and improvements are changes that affect things
> > positively.  Some of these may turn out to fall in the middle but many
> > of them will turn out to be improvements - i.e. because they are up to
> > date and the RI is outdated.
> I'm fully agree with this.
>
> We have applications or internal/external test suite failures. And all
> of this failures could be regressions or not. And we can not be fully
> sure until we will investigate each case.
> So if our next milestone build has new failures, does not matter on
> applications or test suites, anyone  can say that M5 is worse then M4.
> And we could not reply anything on this because we just do not know
> are these failures regressions, non-bug-differencies or even
> improvements.
>
> Thus I vote to investigate all the new discovered issues caused by
> this or any other commit and resolve them.
>
> SY, Alexey
>

Mime
View raw message