harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Fedotov" <alexei.fedo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [JDKTools][JDWP]Let's start JDWP java6 updating
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:33:11 GMT
Jimmy,
thanks for clarification - I understand now, and your choice makes
sense for me. Have a nice weekend as well. :-)


On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Jimmy,Jing Lv <firepure@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  2008/2/22, Alexei Fedotov <alexei.fedotov@gmail.com>:
>
> > Jimmy,
>  >
>  >  I fully support your idea, but cannot follow the discussion fully. The
>  >  old thread mostly discussed a shared memory protocol, didn't it? This
>  >  thread no longer mentions a shared memory, but discusses an API update
>  >  instead. May be all these things are parts of the whole picture, but
>  >  the picture slips out of my mind. I would suggest being merciful to my
>  >  google-weakened brain and write some justifications of the decision
>  >  taken.
>  >
>
>      Yes, I never forget shared memory, but it seems we need more
>  information of that (according to the conclusion of last discussion).
>  However java6 updating is easier to work on and we've got all
>  information on java spec, as a result, IMO, we'd better start from the
>  easy beginning, and leave hard work alone until we find some other way
>  to resolve it, do you think so? :)   (Maybe someone already has a plan
>  on it :)
>       BTW, as today is friday, have a nice weekend :)
>
>
>  >  For example, I believe Mikhail L. justification: "I don't think that
>  >  time and efforts are an issue. The time flies when you are having fun
>  >  :)" is quite explanatory. Or you may come up with something more
>  >  rational.
>  >
>  >  Thanks.
>  >
>  >
>  >  On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Jimmy,Jing Lv <firepure@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  > Hi All,
>  >  >
>  >  >      As discussed before, we can start JDWP updating and improving.
>  >  >  IMHO, let's start from the easiest way, updating to java 6.
>  >  >      My proposal is:
>  >  >  1. Setup a branch of JDKTools for java6 in harmony repository
>  >  >  2. add/improve JDWP functions into java6 level. As the main updating
>  >  >  for java6 JDWP is about JDWP-protocol, it seems no much effect on VM
>  >  >  and debugger.
>  >  >
>  >  >      As M5 freeze will be done at the end of this week,  may start
>  >  >  from next week on.  Any comments/suggestions/Volunteers? Thanks!
>  >  >
>  >  >  --
>  >  >
>  >  >  Best Regards!
>  >  >
>  >  >  Jimmy, Jing Lv
>  >  >  China Software Development Lab, IBM
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > --
>  >  With best regards,
>  >
>  > Alexei
>  >
>
>
>  --
>
>
>
>  Best Regards!
>
>  Jimmy, Jing Lv
>  China Software Development Lab, IBM
>



-- 
With best regards,
Alexei

Mime
View raw message