harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vladimir Beliaev" <vladimir.k.beli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] support gc_cc and original verifier
Date Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:30:20 GMT
+1 also for both

2008/2/13, Pavel Pervov <pmcfirst@gmail.com>:
>
> +1 for both.
>
> We now have stable gc_gen which is more advanced in GC algorithms than
> gc_cc.
> We now have stable verifier which is smaller and faster than old one.
>
> Pavel.
>
> On 2/13/08, Mikhail Loenko <mloenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > there is a number of bugs in gc_cc and not that many volunteers to fix
> them,
> > do we need to continue support it or we better move to archive?
> >
> > the same for original verifier: a number of bugs found in both
> > verifiers were fixed in the default one (verifier-3363) only, should
> > we move the original one into archive?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
>



-- 
Vladimir Beliaev
Intel Middleware Products Division

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message