harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [build] is libxtst-dev a recently added requirement
Date Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:40:36 GMT
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 10 February 2008 at 0:12, "Nathan Beyer" <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>> I'm trying to run a build on a fresh Linux (Ubuntu) box and ran
>> into an error about not finding "-lXtst". This seems to be a part
>> of the libxtst-dev package, but that's not listed on the build
>> pre-requisites, at least not yet. I wanted to check before updating
>> it. Once I installed that package it built.
> I'm sure we've had this discussion before but ... rather than relying
> on unversioned .so files (such as libXtst.so) which are generally
> only found in developer packages, we should be loading/linking known
> good-versioned runtime libraries (such as libXtst.so.6).  It may be
> necessary to attempt to load more than one - such as libXtst.so.5 *if*
> someone has tested that this works - but that would be acceptible
> and more reliable than the current pot-luck loading of unversioned
> libraries.

Yeah, we ended up doing that here [1] by attempting the load of a known 
version (LOAD_LIB_VER macro) and if that fails falling back to 
unversioned library (LOAD_LIB).



View raw message