harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib]remove the duplicate locale data
Date Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:54:25 GMT
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> 2008/2/7, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>> On 7 February 2008 at 15:48, "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 2008/2/6, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com>:
>>>> On 2/7/08, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I would suggest to mark these issues as "must be fixed before M5"
>>>>> since Harmony M5 should not be worse then M4.
>>>> Why do you think these differences are so important?
>>> Because these issues are regressions :)
>> Alexey, I don't think that is fair.
> Do not agree with this :)
> But
>> Regressions are changes that affect
>> things negatively and improvements are changes that affect things
>> positively.  Some of these may turn out to fall in the middle but many
>> of them will turn out to be improvements - i.e. because they are up to
>> date and the RI is outdated.
> I'm fully agree with this.
> We have applications or internal/external test suite failures. And all
> of this failures could be regressions or not. And we can not be fully
> sure until we will investigate each case.
> So if our next milestone build has new failures, does not matter on
> applications or test suites, anyone  can say that M5 is worse then M4.
> And we could not reply anything on this because we just do not know
> are these failures regressions, non-bug-differencies or even
> improvements.
> Thus I vote to investigate all the new discovered issues caused by
> this or any other commit and resolve them.

Yes, they should all be investigated so we can make a determination for M5.


View raw message