harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nathan Beyer" <nbe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [build] ant target naming consistency
Date Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:58:42 GMT
Sounds good to me. +1

Now or later is fine with me.

On Feb 19, 2008 8:46 AM, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this Nathan.
>
> Another thought, it would be useful to have a top-level fetch-depends
> target too.  It would need to call the three (?) more specific fetch-*
> targets.  (As well as being useful, it might also fix the fact that the
> error message you get for missing dependencies when using the federation
> build tells you to run fetch-depends but not where to run it and running
> it in the obvious place, at the top-level, fails as there is no target.)
>
> I'm happy to add this if people think it is worth having for M5.
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
> On 13 February 2008 at 21:32, "Nathan Beyer" <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone object to normalizing the names of the Ant targets? The
> > mixed use of '-' and '_' is starting to push me over the edge. As an
> > example, here's the targets available in the top-level of the
> > federated build.
> >
> >  build-all        build complete implementation
> >  bundle_src       assemble source snapshot
> >  default          setup and build complete implementation
> >  make-snapshot    setup and build complete src + binaries set
> >  populate_source  checkout the class library and VM source trees
> >  reset            removes vm and classlib dirs and resets
> >
> > I'd like to just use '-' across the board.
> >
> > We can maintain the previous targets for a while via redirects and put
> > in some deprecation statements.
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message