harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Zakharov" <alexei.zakha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [testing permission to commit changes to Struts scenario
Date Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:59:31 GMT
All,

As it was agreed I'm going to commit the changes to the Struts
scenario to let it follow the current Harmony behavior - we may use it
for the snapshot testing after fixing it. See HARMONY-5498 for
details. I'm waiting for other committer's vote.

Thanks,
Alexei

2008/2/14, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com>:
> >  > The senario test is writtern by ourselves. My question is, will this
> >  > difference block the struts or not?
>
> I can't say that Struts is *blocked* by this difference. It just uses
> it in one of its standard examples. And our struts scenario checks
> that example. In respect that the example itself is not a production
> application and RI's behavior looks strange indeed I agree we may mark
> it as a non-bug difference and fix Struts scenario to follow the
> current Harmony behavior.
>
> Alexei
>
> 2008/2/13, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > Tony Wu wrote:
> >  > Tim, Alexei
> >  > Seems it is locale dependent. I tried several locales, there is a
> >  > empty string in the output. I can not tell why RI behaves like this.
> >  >
> >  > The senario test is writtern by ourselves. My question is, will this
> >  > difference block the struts or not? If it blocks struts we have to
> >  > work around even if the fix does harm to performance. If not, let's
> >  > keep it as non-bug difference and find out the reason.
> >
> >  My inclination is to leave the current behavior as-is, a non-bug
> >  difference until we get a compelling reason to duplicate this 'bug'.
> >
> >  Regards,
> >
> > Tim
>

Mime
View raw message