Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 716 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2008 13:00:52 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2008 13:00:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 29585 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 13:00:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 29566 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2008 13:00:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 29557 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2008 13:00:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:00:39 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexei.fedotov@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.173] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:00:13 +0000 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u40so233647ugc.3 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:00:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RRpR82l0TmD11G54q8HsGJe7T61E/gB9/qzNtFUokjY=; b=wlvD8KEbos7Rst6AX4loFBnC3MB4/oeMhh4RybDkK0FHVbr3E/0vi1m8httZRkltMXcKejUYGQemZ0A0OIpZ6EaOdhICQl/WfNeJtvx9eoUd3x8jVCFB0C52CZXdNb7x1pqmNhzmf6v46wzlb2VQaY4IC3TucJQQbDKffFo8f8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Tmkb3VkPl6PxiaFppOyLoJI62fwoa52uS5SK14eHjlBNjQe+JNUiy34aHFaNAeelbYqQ1YZme/Yl8iF0I+cklVgmmQQrAKxySiw+sWuTy/Ka7GJq4FuHk1XQiOKRy2VEzitKK0wB1Cvr04RjZqOOZlXNShifmyiVfAim981z/uQ= Received: by 10.66.240.12 with SMTP id n12mr3183333ugh.9.1199970018357; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.20.16 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 05:00:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:00:18 +0300 From: "Alexei Fedotov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [external] One more opportunity of QA for Harmony In-Reply-To: <4bebff790801100340w526ca21ey5da0e2582d984bcd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4bebff790801100340w526ca21ey5da0e2582d984bcd@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alexey, Vladimir Nenashev evaluated this and related tools last year. We had experience that bugs found by automatic tools generally require manual post-evaluation, so we decided to delay an application since we had enough bugs to fix at that moment. If one has time to evaluate the Coverity scan results, I believe he is very welcome to apply. This would be interesting experience I think. :-) Thanks. On Jan 10, 2008 2:40 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: > Hi All, > > I've just recently noticed the tool [1] developed by Coverity, which > does static code analysis for projects. It seems to be used by major > OSS players as another opportunity for QA: that include but no limited > to Linux kernel, Samba, Perl, Python, PHP. Moreover, they recently > introduce Java support. Even though it's focus is security, judging on > reports it could detect memory leaks and other stability-important > stuff. I think it's worth to try scan Harmony. What do you think? > > Thanks, > Aleksey. > > [1] http://scan.coverity.com/ > -- With best regards, Alexei, ESSD, Intel