harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varla...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: latest stable packages JRE packages - jre-r603534 (M4)
Date Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:48:45 GMT
2008/1/17, Vasily Levchenko <vasily.v.levchenko@gmail.com>:
> Indeed, thank you Mark, I've forgot about participating libstdc++ in gcc.
> Usually I avoid using C++ in development and will continue avoid it ;).
>
The radical solution for us would be to swith using alternative
opensource stdc++ lib...

>
> On Jan 17, 2008 11:15 AM, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 17 January 2008 at 6:04, "Vasily Levchenko" <
> > vasily.v.levchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Konstantin, folks,
> > >
> > > On Jan 16, 2008 5:25 PM, Konstantin Lupach <konstantin.lupach@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Mark, can you please comment what are the licensing issues
> > > > preventing us from libstdc++ redistribution you are talking about?
> > >
> > > There shouldn't any legal issues as soon as libstdc++ is LGPL'ed
> >
> > Vasily, where did you find a reference to libstdc++ and LGPL.  If I look
> > at the debian copyright file for libstdc++ it only mentions GPL.  (It
> > mentions an exception to libstdc++ v3 which I think still applies but
> > I'd have to check.)
> >
> > Unlike libc which is a separate package, libstdc++ is really part of
> > gcc/g++ which is GPL so that is the license I always assumed it had?
> >
> > Regards,
> >  Mark.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> --vvl
>

Mime
View raw message