harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Xiao-Feng Li" <xiaofeng...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [performance] quick sort is 4x slower on Harmony
Date Thu, 03 Jan 2008 13:30:50 GMT
On Jan 3, 2008 8:20 PM, Endre StĂžlsvik <Endre@stolsvik.com> wrote:
> Andrew Zhang wrote:
> > On Dec 24, 2007 7:44 AM, Nathan Beyer <nbeyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Can post the code that you're seeing this in? At least a
> >> representative example of the code would be needed to do any analysis.
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > You can find code here:
> > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/2007/12/quicksort-runs-slower-on-harmony.html
> Just out of curiosity: what's the benefit of posting it on a blog, and
> not simply including it in the mail, as you did two posts later?
> On the negative side: Your blog doesn't give any markup benefits,
> coloring - indenting is indeed fully lost (as was the <'s and >'s). Your
> blog entry is totally out of context. It will be indexed by all search
> engines in the universe, and any search on "harmony slower" will give
> this particular blog entry as hit, and since it doesn't have any context
> as mailing list archives do, it will be counted as "harmony is worse" by
> anyone doing the search, and not as "harmony focuses on performance", as
> the mailing list hit will be.
> Seriously, I'm just curious to the reasoning behind the blog post.
> Endre.

Same concern here. The blog title is inaccurate. It reads like a
definite assertion, but actually is a question that needs


View raw message