harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Aleksey Shipilev" <aleksey.shipi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib]remove the duplicate locale data
Date Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:08:25 GMT
Yep, Tim, you're right. I believe that new implementation fixes a
number of bugs and will try to get it not degrading. I just want to
maintain the performance level of current trunk on the same level,
gradually fixing functional bugs. I don't like to sacrifice
performance of HEAD revision for non-critical bugfix. That is, I want
to see HEAD changes like this:

"high performance, minor bug -> high performance, no bugs"

rather than

"high performance, minor bug -> low performance, no bugs -> high
performance, no bugs"

...because anyone could get the HEAD Harmony revision for performance
measurements at any time.

What do you think?

ESSD, Intel.

On Jan 14, 2008 6:43 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> While I agree that performance is important, it is not the only
> consideration.  If this patch fixes a number of bugs then it should be
> considered on that merit, and we should look into retrieving the
> performance numbers on a more capable implementation.

View raw message