Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mloenko@gmail.com designates
 209.85.134.186 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=HRlMGsBbGlVhs6QZyA7KxSANhr+ElVdjAvXJpfV2fF9HYGFmuIJPdB5des61gzwcXiek4v7gkU0SA/RSgpO0N/bvtoR6zM0BGfc7QX3daPlDLyu+AvJaiT9/vaf+IQXO0L+j/PAl3wq99LVkQ6bnFA9ns5QSPekPclgnbQGQf0E=
Message-ID: <906dd82e0712150333o401bdd17i7b21cb9a89eb6849@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 17:33:51 +0600
From: "Mikhail Loenko" <mloenko@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [general] Declare M4 == r603534 ?
In-Reply-To: <4762B54E.4070203@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4762B54E.4070203@gmail.com>

Are we going to publish Windows32, Linux32, and Linux64?
Or Windows64 as well?

2007/12/14, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> Based on your own local testing and on the testing results people have
> reported here, do you think we should declare the r603534 build as M4
> and re-open the codebase for change?
>
> As usual, this is a development milestone, so we know there are issues,
> including some we would likely choose to fix for an end-user release.
> A milestone is a stable development snapshot that does not have any
> critical flaws or regressions.
>
> It doesn't require a formal project vote, just a show of hands.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>