Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ilya.berezhniuk@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.146.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Azj3qmiy3yFslkG2TmAfqJ86gR1ZvzoVA8m+c1jHZfD7HviSEGcL9goV/eZsumIScPxYoqd41z1qLKiiMcBiT3HV6lrWi/TCZhbe54fY3C7fz7IB7arDZcZfaYpRXEyzRr+9Q/wFGbQDIYxQdTKAIVnU5v8UOW42a8zXbqcGYdw=
Message-ID: <5ce835490712130425m6a9d57a8j53ab7c76ce968e45@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:25:02 +0300
From: "Ilya Berezhniuk" <ilya.berezhniuk@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [eut][regressions] EUT regressions on Linux x86
In-Reply-To: <587698b80712130335w717af3ddvdca9b158086be76b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <587698b80712130335w717af3ddvdca9b158086be76b@mail.gmail.com>

I've reproduced crash in 'swt' suite on Linux/x86.
It's actually a hangup, so suite is killed by timeout.

I'll try to find a cause (or at least hanging test) using runs from Eclipse GUI.
Else I'll try to find affecting commit introduced this hangup.

Thanks,
Ilya.

2007/12/13, Vladimir Beliaev <vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com>:
> According to report at
> http://people.apache.org/~smishura/r603433/Linux_x86/eut33/ there are
> regressions for EUT3.3 on Linux x86.
>
> I've checked 6 failures at org.eclispe.jdt.ui.tests.AutomatedSuite - they
> are reproducible. There are just few commits between passed & failed
> revisions, and one of them is my patch for EUT BTI which redefined TMP/HOME
> settings. I continue checking - it may turn out that these 6 tests work with
> related environment variable incorrectly (so the tests may be invalid).
>
> Also I've reproduced 'swt' crash on Linux x86. Checking this regression is a
> separate subject.
>
> Thanks
> Vladimir
>