Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of firepure@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=a4QjQ3ezcua9bWSVdka43AgmpQGBOAMLYFDmsy6OQWn1OleK2Z+tCePCSaHWUonZ9buWrKIO74cOvA5ol6cvqCbl+izMq7BxuCU9yLY/eqv9Cb8QvFYqwaLb5BUDefblAZEeuuTgwX7Jimf28J7qZRTAypHFTq++i5VxyNkAeQY=
Message-ID: <5c8e69f0712060328h74dcd3cblb734757797c74058@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:28:08 +0800
From: "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <firepure@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][luni] Problems merging TreeMap to Java 6 branch
In-Reply-To: <253b20230712060240l3d727373t36670f80e67056a0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4755606E.5030906@gmail.com>
	 <5c8e69f0712040746o57e17b34x7da56ac95d77fe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <253b20230712040836u36852839lc508af7f0b614e44@mail.gmail.com>
	 <47567CA5.9050907@gmail.com>
	 <253b20230712050528x7decc30fl98d8dde59a215fe9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <253b20230712060240l3d727373t36670f80e67056a0@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

2007/12/6, Sergey Kuksenko <sergey.kuksenko@gmail.com>:
> I'd like to mention that HARMONY-5265 fixes all EUT on my runs.
> Let's wait official EUT checking.
>

I'm reading this, really great :)

> Also I'd like to share some performance measurements:
> HARMONY-5265 gives 4%-9% boost for SPECjbb2005. Different boosts depends on
> HW (different processors have different caches and memory sensitivity).
> Note: HARMONY-5232 gives only 2%-5% boost.

Very amazing improvement! Though I dont know how much will java6
TreeMap will gain from this(because of the complex structure), at
least, the new idea(downgrade treemap to sorted array) open a new way
to improve TreeMap and other similar collection utility classes.

> Also I have a bunch of numbers for different micro-benchmarks and I am
> planning to process and share them next week.
>
>
> On 12/5/07, Sergey Kuksenko <sergey.kuksenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > FYI:
> > I've alredy fixed some regressions and I am working on all others.
> >
> >
> >  On 12/5/07, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sergey Kuksenko wrote:
> > > > I will provide real performance numbers next week. Is it ok?
> > > > I want to do some short article about this performance improvement
> > > with
> > > > graphs and diagrams.
> > > > But right now, I wish to fix all bugs before code freeze.
> > > > I will reformat and remove printlns tomorrow.
> > > > As for merging Java6's and Java5's TreeMaps I hope we can do it after
> > > M4.
> > >
> > > Ok, then I'll let the two versions (Java 5 & 6 branches) diverge for the
> > > moment, with the intention that they will be merged again into a single
> > > version that represents the best aspects of the two we have got today,
> > > sometime after M4.
> > >
> > > Let us know when you have a fix for the Java 5 regression
> > > (HARMONY-5248).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > ---
> > Sergey Kuksenko.
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> ---
> Sergey Kuksenko.
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division.
>


-- 

Best Regards!

Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM