harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Board report due
Date Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:41:51 GMT
Here is the data finally:
jdk5 vs harmony5: 99%
Bad: 1 interface, 6 fields, 15 methods, 10 constructors. Missing: 1
package, 9 classes, 430 methods, 12 constructors. Abs.add: 1 method

harmony5 vs jdk5: 99.87%
Bad: 2 classes, 22 fields, 4 methods. Missing: 1 class, 1 constructor.
Abs.add: 1 method.

SY, Alexey

2007/12/12, Alexey Petrenko <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>:
> 2007/12/12, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> > Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> > > On 12 декабря 2007 Pavel Ozhdikhin wrote:
> > >> I've added several comments about new JIT features/optimizations.
> > >>
> > >> I think the following item should be removed from the list:
> > >>
> > >>  - 'full speed debug' : debugging with JIT enabled
> > >>
> > >> It seems Gregory's comment was misinterpreted - he probably meant that
the
> > >> JIT-mode JVMTI debugging now works on x86_64. AFAIK it worked fine on IA32
> > >> in M3. Gregory, could you please confirm?
> > >
> > > Yes, what I meant is that now it is possible to debug applications in default
> > > (JIT) mode on x86_64. Previously in M3 this mode worked only on x86, on
> > > x86_64 it was necessary to use -Xint to use interpreter.
> >
> > I'm sorry, that was my fault.  I misunderstood.  So what does 'debug
> > applications in default JIT mode' mean?
> >
> > Any other updates?
> >
> > Alexey: Do you have the JAPI numbers excluding the endorsed standards
> > packages?  I seem to remember you sent them out, but I can't find them
> > right now.
> I've sent the scripts to Stepan to integrate them to BTI. So probably
> Stepan have this data on hands.
> I can count the numbers tomorrow.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/mixed (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message