harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Regis <xu.re...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][jndi][compat] Shoud Harmony support ri's ldap provider specific properties?
Date Thu, 13 Dec 2007 02:43:27 GMT
I prefer to use Harmony specific properties too, after all it's 
Harmony's provider.

Sian January wrote:
> Hi Regis,
> 
> I don't know the ldap area that well, but in my experience some of these
> kinds of properties can be quite implementation-specific and therefore
> it's not really necessary or helpful to support them in general.  However
agree.
> I'm not sure what makes more sense if we want to have a property that
> essentially does the same thing.  I would probably say we should have a
> Harmony one because I think that's what people would expect when they're
Yes, I think we would have Harmony specific ones first, then, if there were
strong reasons we could add supports for ri's.

> running Harmony, but I don't feel that strongly about it.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sian
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2007, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are some provider-specific environment properties defined in ri's
>> ldap provider, such as,
>> com.sun.jndi.ldap.connect.timeout,  com.sun.jndi.ldap.trace.ber
>>
>> I'm not sure how to deal with these properties, should we support them
>> for compatibility reason
>> or we just supply Harmony's provider specific properties, like
>> org.apache.harmony.jndi.ldap.timeout?
>>
>> Any thoughts or suggestions?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Regis.
>>
> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message