harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregory Shimansky <gshiman...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [drlvm][jitrino]
Date Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:20:29 GMT
On 15 December 2007 史成荣 wrote:
> I still have 2 questions.
>
> First, I know in the Thread Manager, it is the
> hythread_thin_monitor_try_enter method to aquire the mutex lock
> and implement the *memory barrier.* But* *I looked into the code of this
> method, didn't find any memory barrier operations(including the
> apr_memory_rw_barrier() call and  cmpxchg operation) when it is the fat
> lock. when aquiring the fat lock, it calls the hythread_monitor_try_enter
> method. In the hythread_monitor_try_enter method* there isn't *memory
> barrier operations, but has a call of the *hymutex_trylock* method. Does
> the hymutex_trylock method also has barrier effect built-in?

Fat monitors use OS synchronization primitives. You can take a look in 
vm/thread/src/{win,linux}/os_mutex.c files to see the exact implementation.

> Second, when exit the synchoronized area, it should release the mutex lock
> and flush the local memory to the main memory. But the
> hythread_thin_monitor_exit method only release the mutex lock and I don't
> find any flushing operation in hythread_thin_monitor_exit method.
>
> I think there must be some mistakes of my idea, hoping for your advice.

-- 
Gregory

Mime
View raw message