Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76128 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2007 16:58:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Nov 2007 16:58:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 48743 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 16:58:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 48722 invoked by uid 500); 14 Nov 2007 16:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 48699 invoked by uid 99); 14 Nov 2007 16:58:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:58:03 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 66.249.90.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.90.182] (HELO ik-out-1112.google.com) (66.249.90.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:57:50 +0000 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c30so134718ika for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=5ReqmEZpDp3Y/VjCRq3sJIDMgsMRXZiXhZjx8s/yBjY=; b=fQWwptNMlX9IVD5gntD28RP3dv/7MfKR65Gn0EFVZvjk7dmUjTI+DRg66KKJlaMq5oTmpG8z3kbzUahLbxvLSfwm4oVPbLrpWI87xdrhk76sbsbpWHN061Dl3frYRNWwuP5txuB6eIu4tlGdVvCaD3SYRULYW4RWT4FF0+M4OGA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=II6AUXAtEHc994265Kuu9FVvxcwhEIkHuw3lnA0OYFZwWvMfkPWaGOZBCoYAXrO4BKRHRxrbalG5jrhCxNNJhQdWCLsnbqUGMiJEAkXvkGjNRa3z0YprwrYnbP5CQlly+DP6NQd3TKcA5ce6yNtlkN2hEccbDht761NYOJ9Oyz8= Received: by 10.151.13.7 with SMTP id q7mr1412430ybi.1195059462118; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.97.3 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:57:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:57:42 +0300 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: [general] JPackage - new opportunity for Harmony? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One of the Tomcat developers has pointed me to JPackage project[1]. This project is distributing a rather big number of Java based projects for Linux in common way. It also distributes JDKs. Now they have only Sun JDK in their list. I think it would be good for Harmony to try to participate in this project. I've wrote a letter to JPackage discussion list and has received few favorable responses. So we probably should create JPackage compatible rpm of Harmony and suggest it for inclusion. The good thing that we can demonstrate all the benefits of Harmony's modularity by creating a set of rpms and let the user choose which parts of Harmony he really needs. Not so good thing is that we need significant changes to Harmony's build system to be fully compatible with building Harmony from source RPM. Which is probably not a requirement for JPackage but a good form for Linux community. However we can start from simple binary rpm based on Harmony M3 for example. Thoughts? Objections? Thanks in advance. SY, Alexey 1. http://www.jpackage.org