Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-30328-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 2110 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2007 08:01:22 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2007 08:01:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 30602 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2007 08:01:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30565 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2007 08:01:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@harmony.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@harmony.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@harmony.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.harmony.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30555 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2007 08:01:08 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:01:08 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.233.166.176] (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.176)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 08:01:11 +0000
Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so819841pyb
        for <dev@harmony.apache.org>; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        bh=vzieWPzs1TH0rFXpvOrZAipWVJ0Bw+IIMifayFu5MIc=;
        b=q0hjYWWvqjSKCFfR3eLth3NuxW0fwwcru0Pv2NNKoyvJI6A0iQsOtxhkyMj5tTnQjXvn8WkWZefwB8Ztjh2HO+ahRn1MYsaNoOx7X4SGPvjeyMwXioh1Hgc/J7mU/81OZj25Nov0QG4mCFqQfL7OoL+Om3A4wjNukH1iFEIKxaM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=XfktxyLBlCcPZRlbO5jDne6BwkPpZAPC5/0mngW8G/w5rwN/rfg0r6gCv4jvZKpbrtdx9vplcHOuBfM4GLnrbVkm2HWKMKtq+OPOTwIu5vdQctINwGXjE+vCRgQnus4hNeDZCTgwvlSeHZmxAtoIfI0p2AHDwTCby8cORSdFAu8=
Received: by 10.35.51.19 with SMTP id d19mr378094pyk.1193904050234;
        Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.35.86.1 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 01:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <94d710af0711010100l7815c7dcj195acba554e1d85a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 16:00:50 +0800
From: "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [buildtest] Download dependence according to OS type
In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0711010055j8809b8al255c2036845b9e6a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_13362_310200.1193904050225"
References: <94d710af0710312316x3f8b2cfatc7497f690706aaea@mail.gmail.com>
	 <6e47b64f0711010055j8809b8al255c2036845b9e6a@mail.gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_13362_310200.1193904050225
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

+1,  i will try to make a patch for it.

2007/11/1, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
>
> On 11/1/07, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, BTI gurus
> >
> > As we know, some tests need to start a server before process testing,
> such
> > as our jetty scenario test.
> > The question is sometimes the server isn't always implemented by java.
> It
> > may be platform-dependent.
> >
> > Shall we add a new parameter to the dependence module of BTI? Such as
> >
> >    <external>
> >        <my-dependency-windows
> >            url="http://host.of/my-dependency.zip"
> >            md5="87A617D7E65979AE01B5ACE4649EB40B"
> >            dir="my-dep-dir"
> >            inc="*/lib/*.jar"
> >           os="windows"
> >        />
> >    </external>
> >
> >    <external>
> >        <my-dependency-linux
> >            url="http://host.of/my-dependency.zip"
> >            md5="87A617D7E65979AE01B5ACE4649EB40B"
> >            dir="my-dep-dir"
> >            inc="*/lib/*.jar"
> >           os="linux"
> >        />
> >    </external>
> >
> > In this case, BTI can download only one of them according to the current
> > operating system.
> > Does it make sense?  Or just find a java-implemented
> platform-independent
> > alternative?
>
> I think it makes sense to add it. I also thought what that and what
> kind of parameter should be added. I'd propose adding *if* condition
> to the current scheme. I think it is more flexible, for example
>
>         <my-dependency-linux
>             url="http://host.of/my-dependency.zip"
>             md5="87A617D7E65979AE01B5ACE4649EB40B"
>             dir="my-dep-dir"
>             inc="*/lib/*.jar"
>             if="is.64bit"
>         />
>
> Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
> >
> > --
> > Sean Qiu
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>



-- 
Sean Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

------=_Part_13362_310200.1193904050225--