Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Rb1NFh14PWv9L7DYDjnHVVmj8xYTST9pp6lBqIa84NG8DSqZMt7Mh4PCCozgfd4qDyrJL6gzGLkfFnWw13JpESgSyjvjMs4kohdXEYlBQWj1AwowArSF24sGlhKC1HzoE7F8nzuooPvRLxAXBCTVXI0S6hDsy6U0h3MEoipJ310=
Message-ID: <4d0b24970711151835p224701b6se1ea77ab5e3da283@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:35:16 +0800
From: "Andrew Zhang" <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][misc] Could we make ObjectAccessor.getInstance()
 public?
In-Reply-To: <9623c9a50711151503s204d28fex7cd04997545a6bb5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_9323_5899565.1195180517025"
References: <4d0b24970711150116g32e1e925hfe51f3a3236865ad@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9623c9a50711151503s204d28fex7cd04997545a6bb5@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_9323_5899565.1195180517025
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On Nov 16, 2007 7:03 AM, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com> wrote:

> Andrew, what's the supposed real use of this interface? Are there any
> important applications depending on this feature? Or it's only your
> personal interests?


Hi,

An existing application depends on this feature, but I can't say it's
important.
I don't think java developers want to distribute their product as jars +
.so/.dll. Since Harmony has the java side wrapper,  package friend is also
not the problem. The application is using reflection for this functionality
for other platforms.

Well, if it conflicts with our current convention, just ignore my
suggestion. Thanks.

>
>
> Thanks,
> xiaofeng
>
> On Nov 15, 2007 5:16 PM, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I find some methods of ObjectAccessor are useful for some existing
> > applications and potential users, e.g, Object allocateObject(Class).
> Could
> > we make getInstance() public so that users can benefit from these
> utility
> > methods? Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Zhang
> >
> > http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang

http://zhanghuangzhu.blogspot.com/

------=_Part_9323_5899565.1195180517025--