harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Google Android
Date Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:25:11 GMT
Dan Bornstein wrote:
>> I wonder if there any possibility of code reuse
>> between DRLVM and Dalvik.
>> Which chances have JIT, GC, a verifier, or any other part of DRLVM to
>> be reused?
> If the JIT or verifier are based on the bytecode you might find in a
> typical .class file, then I doubt those components will be reusable.
> Dalvik uses a different bytecode. We already verify it, and if/when we
> do a JIT, the JIT would be taking Dalvik bytecode / .dex files as
> input.
> Our allocator today is a fairly simple one built on top of dlmalloc. I
> know we will want something a bit more complex at some point, and the
> DRLVM related code very well may fit the bill. The overriding concerns
> we will have will be minimizing memory overhead and maximizing cache
> locality. We already know, for example, that we will want to do stuff
> to ensure that we can have a (section of the) heap which is shared
> copy-on-write between processes, but where running gc wouldn't force a
> copy; this means that mark bits would have to be segregated from the
> objects that are being marked.
>> Are you interested in developing common runtime building
>> blocks in Apache?
> Put perhaps overly bluntly: I am interested in shipping a good solid
> Android 1.0. I am also interested in sharing as much of the Android
> work as makes sense. But shipping is my #1 priority.

As a 'meta-comment', there are a number of people here who share an
interest in Apache licensed managed runtimes, and have some considerable
experience with it.  I think it will be valuable to maintain
communication between the projects (and I know you share that POV).


View raw message