harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [build] Post-build relocation for Harmony
Date Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:29:04 GMT
Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2007 10:56 PM, Aleksey Shipilev <aleksey.shipilev@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Looking at the doc for editbin, I agree that /largeaddressaware looks
>>>>> like a good option too.  How about /bind ?  Given we just rebased the
>>>>> DLLs it may help with start-up times?
>>>> That makes sense for the sake of modularity, sure, but that's not the
>>>> post-build action since we don't know what libraries will be used
>>>> exactly. So we need to prepare for the worst case and relocate most of
>>>> them.
>>> Are we talking about the same thing.  If I read /bind properly it
>>> preloads the addresses of entry points assuming that the DLLs do not
>>> conflict -- which we hope will be true after rebasing.
>> Good shot, I've missed the point there. I would spend some time for
>> studying /BIND behavior and come up with the result a bit later.
> So I haven't any boosts/degradations on HWA, but updated the patch
> with /BIND. Hopefully it will help someday :) Please see JIRA for
> updated patch.

Too bad that we can't use a fileset rather than name the files
individually, this could be quite brittle.

Why do you have three lines the same?
<arg value="${build.deploy.dir}/jdk/jre/bin/icuin34.dll" />
<arg value="${build.deploy.dir}/jdk/jre/bin/icuin34.dll" />
<arg value="${build.deploy.dir}/jdk/jre/bin/icuin34.dll" />


View raw message