harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Asaf Yaffe <asaf_ya...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][verifier] Dead-code and Java 6 verification issues
Date Wed, 07 Nov 2007 12:13:18 GMT
Hi Mikhail,

You wrote:

I like the idea of simplification which you pointed, but I think this
approach is not quite correct in general: the dead code might be in
the try block. In this case stackmap locals at the dead block should
be assignable to stackmap at the handler_pc instruction.

In other words, if catch block accesses locals defined before the try
 block and
this try block has a dead code, then stackmap for the dead code can't
have empty locals: otherwise Java6 verification would fail



I am not sure I understand the problem. Assume you "nop" all instructions in the dead block
and finalize it with an "athrow". According to the Java 6 verification rules, the only thing
you need is a [][java/lang/Throwable] StackMap. This is because (from the verification algorithm):

1. A nop instruction is always type safe. The nop instruction does not affect the type state
2. An athrow instruction is type safe iff the top of the operand stack matches Throwable

The verifier cannot (and will not) check the consistency of this block with other blocks because
this block in unreachable. It will also not check the consistency of this block with "applicable"
exception handlers because it does not perform this check for "nop" and "athrow" instructions.

Thanks,
Asaf




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message