Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53203 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2007 07:54:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2007 07:54:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 52263 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 07:54:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 52233 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2007 07:54:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 52224 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2007 07:54:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:54:24 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mloenko@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.188 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.188] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.188) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:54:26 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k4so3045656nfd for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=46Pqm7XEZPP8kbPRPmrX3gKUsBzHtnMj6XNqcfFmdHQ=; b=NiG3sVaeOxlYeYGS9I+OwZ8MBrdRmPtDxxZv6O3loIlzZaIRgLv2jRdntU28C6wsfDGCUO5voNVcjISW+3Kkr/ga1jgsYJcbxfh/iiZyu72IdSWDh21Nu7wJsF+DkgGhnAFAE0Quu75Vcwo1l5WosMx8Sjm4IifgskBdHbAswx4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BqaLDhWPn+Kc0GYkKjDkwyjrzlF0Pd1uK61bUJQ/RjIHqHGpFfxV+F3SAZFMdAwCMomPg6c9JaT+H1/WKT93sh41Q9hsBgXtrm8EpgqiP7Iuyc1ZKboAl7Ifi0hD+yeh08lZlQVrlbcb0eJ0v1o6SXZB0Fnk6a/AAnVpQMRaRjo= Received: by 10.78.159.7 with SMTP id h7mr4302948hue.1191311644668; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.41.4 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 00:54:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <906dd82e0710020054w58690fe8y180fbb7738f86919@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:54:04 +0400 From: "Mikhail Loenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general][M3] release candidate status In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0710020046g598cc2d8o1c5ba90a92fb2d3e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e47b64f0709280102t5fe06a2fid47fa8b1ebb7b3f3@mail.gmail.com> <6e47b64f0710020046g598cc2d8o1c5ba90a92fb2d3e@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Do we see any M3 blockers so far? Thanks, Mikhail 2007/10/2, Stepan Mishura : > Hi, > > Currently, the next milestone candidate (r580985) is under testing. > > There were a number of investigation reports for r579330 and I'd like > to update its summary to track the progress. All > > * Class library: > - Windows: 1 crash (hard to reproduce) > - Linux: 1 crash (HARMONY-4873), 1 failure (incorrect test - HARMONY-4872) > * Eclipse 3.2 unit tests: > - Windows: > 4 failures - 1 is expected, 3 hard to reproduce (exclude list > was updated) > - Linux: > issue with org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.TestAll suite > timeout still remains. > * Eclipse 3.3 unit tests: > Success rate on Windows - 99.77% and Linux 99.46%. > This results will be taken as baseline for tracking regressions. > * Eclipse Geronimo Application (EGA) scenario x 48h > - Windows: > failed after 8 running hours, most probably the problem > with scenario automation - no crashes/exceptions in the output > * Eclipse TPTP Tests: > - Linux: 1 intermittent failure > * Functional Test Suite: > 4 regressions were found - HARMONY-4866, HARMONY-4874, > HARMONY-4857, HARMONY-4861 > 6 tests are invalid - HARMONY-4864(2 cases), HARMONY-4859 (1 > case), JIRA for others?? > HARMONY-4867 - should be defined whether this is regression or not > Also there are many failures due to timeout or intermittent failures. > The suite definitely must be improved. > * Geronimo Unit Tests > 2 regressions on Windows/Linux - no evaluation yet > * JDKTools tests: > Windows: 1 failure - reproducible only if the whole suite is run. > (HARMONY-4868) > * Reliability Test Suite: > - Windows: 13 failures - according to the evaluation report most > of them are intermittent and additional investigation is required > - Linux: 14 failures - the same as for Windows > * Stress Test Suite: > - Windows: 3 failures > - Linux: 11 failures > Most of test failures due to timeout or OutOfMemoryError - the > suite must be improved. There is HARMONY-4114 with 1Mb patch for the > suite and harness but it is too risky to apply it during code freeze - > will be applied in M4. > * VTS VM Test Suite > - Linux: 1 intermittent failure - problems in DRLVM shutdown code > (HARMONY-????). > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > On 9/28/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > OK. Here is testing status for r579330 M3 milestone candidate. > > It is based on testing status page[1] and investigation reports for > > suites on dev-list. > > It is provided to decide whether r579330 is OK to be released or we > > should fix found issues and build next release candidate. > > > > Status reporter please correct me if I miss something. > > > > I'd like to say that this in this milestone we used BTI for the first > > time to get 100% of testing results. Some issues in BTI were fixed but > > there are some still to be resolved, for example instability of > > several suites, mostly Eclipse unit tests on Linux. > > > > > > The following suites passed on Linux/Windows ia32 platform: Ant > > Scenario (or self-hosting), Axis application, Dacapo, DRLVM tests, > > DRLVM regression tests, Jetty scenario, Scimark, Struts scenario, > > Tomcat scenario > > > > The the next list of issues we have (per suite): > > - Classlibrary unit tests: > > 1 crash on Windows that is hard to reproduce: > > 1 crash on Linux that is reproducible and it is bug in DRLVM (HARMONY-????): > > 1 test failure on Linux (incorrect test HARMONY-????) > > > > - Eclipse unit tests 3.2 > > Windows: 4 failures. 1 failure is expected (exclude list should be > > updated). 3 failure are not reproducible > > Linux: crash of > > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.TestAll. It crashes due > > timeout > > > > - Eclipse unit tests 3.3 > > Windows: 49 failures, pass rate 99.77%. We haven't tried the suite > > on M2 so it is a good baseline for M3. > > Linux: the same problem as for 3.2. I've setup another CC Linux > > host for the suite and see no crashes, pass rate is 99.45% > > > > So I'm going to publish these reports for M3 and run 3.2 suite on > > these lucky host to obtain results without the crash. > > > > - Eclipse Geronimo Application (EGA) scenario x 48h > > Windows: there may be and issue with the scenario automation - the > > scenario run more then 8 hours. As I understand several iterations > > were done successfully. And it failed because of missing window, there > > are no crash/exceptions in the log. > > > > Also the scenario passed on Linux. > > > > - Eclipse TPTP Tests > > 1 failure on Linux - most probably intermittent > > > > - Functional Test Suite > > 21 failures on Windows most of then failure due to timeout. 1 > > regression (HARMONY-4857) > > Uploading Linux failed - I'm going to check why. From the first > > glance the results are same as for Windows. > > > > - Geronimo Unit Tests > > 2 possible(I haven't seen analysis report) regressions on > > Windows/Linux. These test passed on M2: > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.ContainerTest > > org.apache.geronimo.tomcat.JAASSecurityTest > > > > - JDKTools Tests > > 1 failure on Windows. The test stably fails when it runs in a bunch > > with others and may fail if run standalone : > > > > - Reliability Test Suite > > The status is a bit unclear to me. There is 1 test is incorrect > > test. And some tests failed because of timeout but its increase didn't > > help. > > Also some tests were removed from exclude list for r579330 but some > > of them failed. > > > > - Stress Test Suite > > 3 failures on Windows and 11 on Linux - I haven't seen analysis report > > > > - VTS VM Test Suite > > 1 failure on Linux - the test passed on previous snapshot should be analysed. > > > > Any comments are welcome. > > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r579330/index.html > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division >