harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][icu] Bringing ICU level up to 3.8
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:18:16 GMT
>
> IMHO it would be good for classlib to move to pure icu4j for the reasons
> I've stated, plus it would mean that we could entirely remove the native
> code from the text module and also the BidiWrapper class, which I see as
> a bonus.


I do not object here. :)

There are still a few bugs to be ironed out in icu4j 3.8 before we start
> using it (unless we are willing to put up with almost all the Bidi tests
> failing, which I don't think would be acceptable) so the transition to
> 3.8 would not happen for a little while yet anyway. When the time came,
> I would think it would make sense to move these libraries to DRLVM as
> they would no longer be dependencies of classlib. Perhaps at that point
> it would also be worth stepping the icu4c libraries up to 3.8 so
> classlib and drlvm are at the same level?


I think when we are done with classlib, we file a JIRA on DRLVM build to
update ICU4C to the latest version and to move it to DRLVM dependencies.

Regards,
> Oliver


WBR,

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message