harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [testing] make the tests structure comply with our testing conventions
Date Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:08:46 GMT
2007/10/26, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
>
> Sean Qiu wrote:
> > What i am going to do is to run our tests within RI 1.5.0 first,
> > move the failed testing classes from src/test/api to src/test/impl and
> > reserve their packaging names.
> >
> > The encountered problem is that some tests may contain both api
> testcases
> > and impl testcases.
> > IMHO, we can just move these testing classes into src/test/impl.
> > So the tests in src/test/api can run successfully in any compatible
> > implementations.
> >
> > Does it make sense? Any suggestions? Any volunteers?


yes, and make them comply with our testing conventions .

Or split the test class up to separate the API and impl tests?
>
> You are right that the LUNI tests at least are a bit messy right now,
> based on their history of some being written early, some contributed,
> etc. etc.  Thank you for helping to tidy them up.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>


-- 
Sean Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message