harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Test] Shall we maintain a individual archive for our classlib unit test?
Date Wed, 17 Oct 2007 06:01:44 GMT
Great.

2007/10/17, Alexey Varlamov <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com>:
>
> The idea is floating around for a while, there are related JIRA
> entries with 3-digit ids ;). Surely it worths to be done, all
> components (including not only classlib but drlvm and jdktools as
> well) have a lot of tests suitable for that.
> We just need a framework (either standalone or a part of build system)
> - so patches are always welcome :)
>
> 2007/10/17, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com>:
> > Of couse we can.
> > We have our classlib modularized, so does their test.
> >
> > 2007/10/17, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > On 10/17/07, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Like some other famous open source project , i.e. derby,eclipse,
> they
> > > will
> > > > release the project as well as a individual jar of their test.
> > > > Gnu Classpath even has sub-project called Mauve which consists of
> many
> > > unit
> > > > test.
> > > >
> > > > Harmony has so many unit tests that our user can make use of.
> > > > Most user will download our binary release rather than checking out
> the
> > > > souce, building and testing.
> > > > I guess we can archive a testing.jar for user, so they can test
> their
> > > binary
> > > > jre directly without any building.
> > > >
> > > > Within a testing.jar and a build.xml, we can run test through one
> > > command:
> > > >
> > > > $> ant -Dtest.jre.dir=${path}/jre
> > > >
> > > > What's more, there are two kinds of test, some are harmony
> > > implementation
> > > > dependent tests.
> > > > And the rest are public api tests.
> > > > We can publish the public API tests for other independent
> > > implementation.
> > > > (Though the candidates are hard to find right now.)
> > > >
> > > > Even RI can use our test if they want.
> > > >
> > > > Any comments? Suggestions?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Probably a good idea. It should also consider the case that people
> > > developing a module may only care about the tests of that module.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > xiaofeng
> > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sean Qiu
> > > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sean Qiu
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>



-- 
Sean Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message