harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Test] Shall we maintain a individual archive for our classlib unit test?
Date Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:38:03 GMT
Of couse we can.
We have our classlib modularized, so does their test.

2007/10/17, Xiao-Feng Li <xiaofeng.li@gmail.com>:
>
> On 10/17/07, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Like some other famous open source project , i.e. derby,eclipse, they
> will
> > release the project as well as a individual jar of their test.
> > Gnu Classpath even has sub-project called Mauve which consists of many
> unit
> > test.
> >
> > Harmony has so many unit tests that our user can make use of.
> > Most user will download our binary release rather than checking out the
> > souce, building and testing.
> > I guess we can archive a testing.jar for user, so they can test their
> binary
> > jre directly without any building.
> >
> > Within a testing.jar and a build.xml, we can run test through one
> command:
> >
> > $> ant -Dtest.jre.dir=${path}/jre
> >
> > What's more, there are two kinds of test, some are harmony
> implementation
> > dependent tests.
> > And the rest are public api tests.
> > We can publish the public API tests for other independent
> implementation.
> > (Though the candidates are hard to find right now.)
> >
> > Even RI can use our test if they want.
> >
> > Any comments? Suggestions?
> >
>
> Probably a good idea. It should also consider the case that people
> developing a module may only care about the tests of that module.
>
> Thanks,
> xiaofeng
>
> > --
> > Sean Qiu
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> >
>
>
> --
> http://xiao-feng.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Sean Qiu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message