harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] publish SPECjbb2005 scores
Date Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:21:29 GMT
This is what I was thinking about as well.

Non-profit/educational license for JBB2005 is 125$ [1]

But some logistics is not clear for me:

Though it's possible that one can buy it and grant to ASF, it's not clear
who in ASF has authority to accept the grant

It's also not clear who will then be able to use the SPEC and how we will
maintain this "USER will not permit any third party to use or copy the
original or any copy thereof. In the event of unauthorized transfer or
copying, USER will pay SPEC a penalty in the amount of one additional
fee for each such transfer or copy." from [2]

The third thing that's not clear for me is who should approve submitting
the results and behalf of Apache Harmony.


[1] http://www.spec.org/order.html
[2] http://www.spec.org/spec/docs/sample_license_agreement.pdf

18 Oct 2007 18:51:16 +0400, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com>:
> Folks,
> ..just thinking.. would be really nice to have Harmony/DRLVM
> SPECjbb2005 results published officially on spec.org (!!!) given the
> number of performance work recently, I believe in good results right
> from the start (and I believe in perf improvements:)
> IMHO, it should help Harmony to gain interest from enterprise vendors
> (I mean, those nice people who do not pay attention to DaCapo scores
> for some (unknown) reason)
> the funniest thing is that according to [1] non-profit cost is
> non-zero for some (unknown) reason and looks like $125. But since
> Apache is a real NON PROFIT, Apache does not pay even 2c, right?
> I wonder how Apache cooks things like that?
> [1] http://www.spec.org/order.html
> --
> Egor Pasko

View raw message