harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregory Shimansky <gshiman...@apache.org>
Subject Re: today's drlvm is not buildable on linux em64t
Date Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:23:21 GMT
Sergey Dmitriev wrote:
> Well I have an update on this:
> the root cause is in the -Dos.arch=x86_64 keyword. Previous versions
> (say 22 oct 2007) of DRLVM build did identify the underlying OS arch
> automatically. The current version does not so you have to specify
> this keywork. Just wanted to check - is it made intentionally or is a
> bug?

You need to define os.arch by hands when you use 32-bit JRE to run ant 
to build DRLVM. In this case JRE defines os.arch=x86 and ant uses the 
same value. I checked DRLVM's diff since 22 Oct and I found no string 
containing os.arch, so DRLVM didn't change in defining this property, it 
reuses it from the JRE that is used to run ant. Are you sure that it is 
not your local setup that changed so that you started to use 32-bit JRE?

> On 10/29/07, Vladimir Beliaev <vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The build from scratch passed...
>> HARMONY-5032<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-5032> is
>> not reproducible.
>> 2007/10/26, Vladimir Beliaev <vladimir.k.beliaev@gmail.com>:
>>> As far as I see in HARMONY-5032 Gregory can not reproduce the issue (AFAIK
>>> he tried debug build).
>>> I've just retried with release build & was not able to reproduce the issue
>>> (pls, see my update in HARMONY-5032).
>>> Note that I did not tried a fresh build - just executed 'ant' from
>>> federated build root.
>>> I'm double check veery-fresh release build now (i.e. starting from "svn
>>> checkout ..." command).
>>> Thanks
>>> Vladimir Beliaev
>>> 2007/10/26, Sergey Dmitriev <sergey.v.dmitriev@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hello
>>>> just wanted to make sure you guys are aware of linux em64t situation.
>>>> As it turned out r588319 is not buildable. Please refer to
>>>> HARMONY-5032.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Sergey


View raw message