harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregory Shimansky <gshiman...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Numbering of snapshots/release candidates/etc
Date Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:34:43 GMT
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 3 October 2007 at 13:32, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/2/07, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Something to think about after M3...
>>>
>>> On 2 October 2007 at 14:46, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>
wro
>> te:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Currently, the next milestone candidate (r580985) is under testing.
>>> It might be more consistent if we named candidates/snapshots/etc
>>> using the canonical revision number - i.e. the last change revision
>>> number - rather than some arbitrary revision number after it (and
>>> before the next change).
>>>
>> I agree. I think this may correlate with auto selection of revision
>> number for the next snapshot. The idea is to create automation for
>> collecting/analysing integrity testing results and choosing the best
>> revision for some period of time (for example, 48 hours)
> 
> Sounds good so long as we can find a way to pick the best revision 
> without doing too many queries against the svn server. ;-)

I think it is possible to use "svn info" to get "Last Changed Rev" out 
of the repository. It doesn't query the server at all.

-- 
Gregory


Mime
View raw message