harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Numbering of snapshots/release candidates/etc (was: Re: [general][M3] release candidate status)
Date Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:16:51 GMT

On 3 October 2007 at 13:32, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Something to think about after M3...
> >
> > On 2 October 2007 at 14:46, "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mishura@gmail.com> wro
> te:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently, the next milestone candidate (r580985) is under testing.
> >
> > It might be more consistent if we named candidates/snapshots/etc
> > using the canonical revision number - i.e. the last change revision
> > number - rather than some arbitrary revision number after it (and
> > before the next change).
> >
> 
> I agree. I think this may correlate with auto selection of revision
> number for the next snapshot. The idea is to create automation for
> collecting/analysing integrity testing results and choosing the best
> revision for some period of time (for example, 48 hours)

Sounds good so long as we can find a way to pick the best revision 
without doing too many queries against the svn server. ;-)

-Mark.



Mime
View raw message