Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59018 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2007 07:57:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2007 07:57:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 71119 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2007 07:57:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 71093 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2007 07:57:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 71077 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2007 07:57:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:57:26 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of pmcfirst@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.230 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.230] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 07:57:27 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so1843815wxc for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=U58ldItsiTYfC1YBl7xVai8atLCvqiCAUJ4GkBcSlyE=; b=M8rfwuBTX79U6ANJYoMw9VEvgn9/FgwL3d59AHItH6l+QQmpBGS3HK0Ft82O0gynx00Gw7o9B8KmvBH9jmMp1m/HAwfZTvfJqHDF3zIYL282SEbwLyo0RQxpmCWtpVC7G8lMKMV52pexHmjMYqJ5UtCwAd8Mwzub4OMM3pbwE4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=M98xHooxCpFqSo2rIdfeSN6Zp997da3W9Df1LfFC7uN5TH86gWO4ICdtqJjnbvy3SEaFZgFPDH726hC4zDOV655Gw6kQQtSieehSL8ujYViJbPv3ucg1JWRKwFMf5J+5pRHyF8SSf6pd8FjSgsVww5XX5twhCV7JWbYBRfUynqI= Received: by 10.90.79.6 with SMTP id c6mr2201719agb.1190879826410; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.32.5 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:57:06 +0400 From: "Pavel Pervov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [vtsvm] no regressions since M2 Re: [general] M3 - code frozen In-Reply-To: <6e47b64f0709262023j7a54a380k8b67968e3ed0cadc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_39_23294422.1190879826387" References: <6e47b64f0709262023j7a54a380k8b67968e3ed0cadc@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_39_23294422.1190879826387 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Stepan, most of the tests which fail on Linux x86-64 are JVMTI tests. So, the root cause is that JVMTI is not fully supported and tested on x86-64 platforms yet. WBR, Pavel. On 9/27/07, Stepan Mishura wrote: > On 9/26/07, Pavel Pervov wrote: > > Linux x86-64 does not count as there were no results for VTSVM for M2 on > > Linux x86-64. > > > > I suggest adding currently failing VTSVM tests to exclude list on Linux > > x86-64 (~450 tests). > > > > Hi Pavel, > > Could you give us more info please - why so many tests fail on Linux > 64bit? Have you find a root cause? > > Thanks, > Stepan. > > > -- Pavel Pervov, Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division ------=_Part_39_23294422.1190879826387--