Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96722 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2007 10:09:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Sep 2007 10:09:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 78577 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2007 10:09:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 78547 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2007 10:09:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 78538 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2007 10:09:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:09:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of firepure@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.185] (HELO rv-out-0910.google.com) (209.85.198.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 10:11:10 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so148685rvb for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:09:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pSPNZcAmMut9MWe0CflTkY0m+0eudMvydKDV43XgmIo=; b=LwJqMnkDNIlH+nskYnS/vznt6HoKcjxRy4Qi5FDVCYIpdx6xNIVpXKvgr2qvmdkZPfQr0Ov6LnzOblAo3RWJhob3Vh2mAZsDqlWezCrVD4wttY1nAR/5ASgx2fKuPCGmrR4xVSdkF/3Njrse1Ccb/YsUJi+eDYhRCDzHUCLkqV0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JIs6322p0TWxRzmZXBKrI44HtNmmSZsAubv9vUJqz/FRqxWNFIeGDPcI2Cp+aPwzqGjm5SAnelOHxT8Psvix2mOglio12bN67N/7BSvgMSwEKK9WqP2wlrCfD/UXX4lXe8tKskdQHNNvd8OuzUO9OyauHKH4UpkGIVBncqok6pM= Received: by 10.141.107.13 with SMTP id j13mr120894rvm.1189591752172; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.76.18 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5c8e69f0709120309m383dd216tbf9c44cfdb00ed65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:09:12 +0800 From: "Jimmy,Jing Lv" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib][Sound]Great News! Tritonus and Harmony can now join together! In-Reply-To: <46E6FFCA.8050802@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <5c8e69f0709110325qe79c915o7b6c8a7ece4a7f8@mail.gmail.com> <46E6FFCA.8050802@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2007/9/12, Tim Ellison : > Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > > Here is a great news that the two authors of the open source > > java-sound project Tritonus[1], Matthias and Florian, have kindly > > agreed that they can re-license Tritonus to be BSD or BSD-like > > license, so that Tritonus and Harmony can now join together to build a > > full-implemented sound module. > > `Sounds` great ;-) > > > With Tritonus' help, Harmony can now have real-implementation of > > java-sound, have can now have its own voice :) What's more, Tritonus > > support variety of audio types more than stardard RI does ( though > > some of them are GPL/LGPL, and we still can let users to decided > > whether to download themselves). > > > > I don't know if we need some further official steps, would some > > Harmony PMCs help do this? Thanks! > > Nothing special, we should help to ensure the license they choose is > compatible, then wait until the relicensing is complete. Then we can > make it a dependency for our sound implementation. > Hi, So do we need to write a official letter or let them sign some agreement? Or just let them send Harmony a copy of src code with BSD license? Sorry I don't know much on such legal issues. IMHO, BSD and apache license are both OK for this re-license. And the two authors seems don't care about it much. :) > > Thanks very much to Matthias and Florian, and cheers! > > Indeed. > > Regards, > Tim > -- Best Regards! Jimmy, Jing Lv China Software Development Lab, IBM