Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65539 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2007 05:21:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Oct 2007 05:21:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 68090 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2007 05:20:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 68068 invoked by uid 500); 1 Oct 2007 05:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 68059 invoked by uid 99); 1 Oct 2007 05:20:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:20:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexei.zakharov@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.183 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.183] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 05:20:58 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so6727014waf for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:20:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=30LzciEnVIuYitfDRpu3rFmMCnetminFTy39hfwkoDg=; b=h6DXME1hPpu8Z2CR+yIo3zTnHErE9DmxkoJqyiS15jtPYbVBQ/KVrxm1fntHdexZMz4zJU/z1eWy8u4xtK3lV0u0IFg1NWeQhJl7XUmgBJYcbTBbuutmzASPthtcgHYHGhkE+2JZJTWXNCPNbilPrnPkcinenE/lFrAx2M1SqfQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DvZYFqgNnWeH0X7FDU4KWwBiSHHUk88mFobyfK9t0T7SNyHK/vTisvmBPc9cEpi/TxduWlNJ4OT1nHWPghlkzB5auqcsviB2E/cNANN7TWWtBTO9N1iCaykUmuThvMy5hPbjYEdOEhaY84hG+mdSnHCv3+eP86EsQ7ZmPjVEcE0= Received: by 10.114.80.4 with SMTP id d4mr4107017wab.1191216038121; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.197.6 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2c9597b90709302220r186e888dkfc23ec3404fc6eb3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 09:20:38 +0400 From: "Alexei Zakharov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [build] Retaining too many snapshots In-Reply-To: <47000483.7090803@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <46FEAC3D.8000100@gmail.com> <47000483.7090803@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have no objections. However, if we are limited in space we could probably reduce our snapshot frequency to say once or twice a week. Since we do not not always respond to regressions promptly - here I mostly mean some non-integration test suites like tomcat tests or struts - sometimes it is useful to have a snapshot that was built one or two weeks ago. BTW, how do other Apache projects solve this? Regards, Alexei 2007/10/1, Tim Ellison : > Tim Ellison wrote: > > ASF infra have pointed out that we are retaining far too many snapshot > > builds [1]. > > > > I think we only need to have the most recent three snapshot builds for > > each platform. The snapshots page [2] is way too long too -- why do we > > need all these? > > > > Unless there are any objections I'll go and delete the old ones. > > I realize that it is only 24hrs over a weekend since the call for > objections, but I believe we need to be good ASF citizens, so I'm going > to go ahead and delete a number of old snapshots to free up space on > people.apache.org. > > I don't have rights to delete a number of them, so hopefully Stepan and > Alexey can help me to trim down the retained builds. > > I looked at Mikhail's snapshot download page, and it will regenerate to > reflect the missing snapshots next time the script runs. BTW it would > be good if we had these scripts and templates checked into SVN and part > of the site code rather than in home directories. > > Regards, > Tim