Of course, i will try. 2007/9/12, Mikhail Loenko : > > 2007/8/31, Sean Qiu : > > I have uploaded the test result [1] with harmony classslib and ibm j9 vm > > ,since drlvm cannot generate the report. > > Thanks, Sean. Could you please provide more details on why drlvm cannot > generate the report. JIRA issue would be fine > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > > I first find out a list that ri can pass all of the test. (Ri cannot > pass > > all the tests). > > Then run this list with harmony jre. The result is as followings [2] > > > > I have started to dive into the code to find out the problems. > > It seems some tests of them are trivial and the reason of failure is due > to > > behavior difference. > > > > Later, i will try to run all the tests regardless of ri results. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4701 > > [2] test results > > Package: Passed: Failed: Total: > > > java/awt > > 1946 127 2070 + > > > color > > 38 0 38 + > datatransfer > > 9 6 14 + > dnd > > 50 1 51 + > geom > > 2650 66 2714 + > > > image > > 60747 168 60896 > > > java/beans > > 283 17 297 + > > > beancontext > > 130 1 > 130 java/io > > 651 18 > 667 java/lang > > 2049 16 2064 + > > > ref > > 10 0 10 + > reflect > > 340 1 > 341 java/math > > 379 8 > 387 java/net > > 834 78 > 910 java/nio > > 2944 2 2946 + > > > channels > > 9 0 9 + > charset > > 34 1 > 35 java/rmi > > 20 0 > 20 java/security > > 160 0 > 160 java/text > > 793 39 829 + > > > AttributedCharacterIterator > > 3 0 > 3 java/util > > 6053 16 6068 + > > > jar > > 5 0 5 + > logging > > 225 1 225 + > > > regex > > 85 5 90 + > zip > > 179 0 > 179 javax/accessibility > > 2 0 > 2 javax/crypto > > 28 0 > 28 javax/imageio/plugins > > 85 0 > 85 javax/imageio/spi > > 10 26 > 15 javax/imageio/stream > > 8 0 > 8 javax/naming > > 65 0 65 + > directory > > 4 0 > 4 javax/net/ssl > > 0 3 > 2 javax/print > > 47 2 49 + > attribute > > 113 12 125 + > > > attribute/standard > > 2 0 > 2 javax/security/auth > > 2 0 > 2 javax/swing > > 4169 274 4410 + > > > JInternalFrame > > 4 0 4 + > JList > > 3 11 8 + > JList/AccessibleJList > > 1 15 1 + > JRootPane > > 15 0 15 + > JScrollPane > > 3 1 4 + > JSpinner > > 49 0 49 + > JTable > > 1 1 1 + > JTable/AccessibleJTable > > 2 2 2 + > UIManager > > 4 0 4 + > border > > 105 7 112 + > > > event > > 207 19 226 + > > > filechooser > > 11 0 11 + > plaf > > 31 0 31 + > plaf/basic > > 816 113 921 + > > > plaf/basic/BasicSplitPaneUI > > 4 0 4 + > plaf/metal > > 345 152 494 + > > > plaf/metal/MetalBorders > > 24 6 30 + > plaf/metal/MetalIconFactory > > 4 2 6 + > table > > 568 19 579 + > > > table/JTableHeader > > 0 3 1 + > table/JTableHeader/AccessibleJTableHeader > > 0 13 0 + > text > > 1432 216 1640 + > > > text/AbstractDocument > > 13 2 14 + > text/DefaultStyledDocument > > 583 4 586 + > > > text/FlowView > > 0 1 0 + > text/html > > 165 3 168 + > > > text/html/parser > > 1494 169 1663 + > > > tree > > 1172 25 1195 + > > > undo > > 178 17 > 194 javax/xml > > 1 0 1 + > parsers > > 1 0 > 1 org/omg/CORBA > > 88 7 90 + > portable > > 31 0 31 + > 2_3 > > 0 1 > 1 org/omg/DynamicAny > > 241 0 > 241 org/omg/IOP > > 0 1 > 0 org/omg/PortableServer > > 6 2 7 > > > > 2007/8/27, Sean Qiu : > > > > > > Of course, thanks for you help. > > > > > > 2007/8/24, Mikhail Loenko : > > > > > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > would you like to try installing regular run of this suite against > > > > snapshots? > > > > If you make the results available by some URL, I'd updated the list > > > > of source URL (@test_results_links in [1]) and results of the > testing > > > > would > > > > automatically appear in the tables [2,3] > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mikhail > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots.pl< > http://people.apache.org/%7Emloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots.pl> > > > > [2] > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots_summary.html > > > > > > > > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Emloenko/snapshot_testing/script/snapshots_summary.html > > > > > > [3] > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r567890/index.html > < > http://people.apache.org/%7Emloenko/snapshot_testing/script/r567890/index.html > > > > > > > > > > 2007/8/24, Sean Qiu < sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com>: > > > > > 2007/8/23, Alexey Varlamov : > > > > > > > > > > > Sean, > > > > > > > > > > > > Nice work - I've integrated this JIRA into SVN. I'm curious what > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks very much. > > > > > > > > > > next - TestNG, JMock, Mauve? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have got the test list that we can pass successfully. > > > > > So i will try mauve first. > > > > > > > > > > BTW, the derby 10.3.1.4 finally release, and this one includes the > > > > derby > > > > > junit test now. I am trying derby too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, recalling the XMLReporter issue with Mauve, you can simply > > > > > > contact their developers and ask for this feature or even > provide > > > > > > ready-to-commit patch. I think it is the best solution. > > > > > > Good luck, and looking forward for the new adapters! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again. I will try. > > > > > > > > > > 2007/8/22, Sean Qiu : > > > > > > > 2007/8/22, Tim Ellison < t.p.ellison@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean Qiu wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, guys > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have wrote a new adaptor to integrate junit's tests into > BTI > > > > 2.0. > > > > > > > > > Could someone pls try this patch [1] ? Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4637 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wouldn't know Sean, but hopefully the BTI gurus can > > > > comment. I took > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > look at the files and it seems remarkably simple to > incorporate > > > > > > JUnit's > > > > > > > > test suites if that is all that is required. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes , i am going to add some other test suites into our BTI. > > > > > > > And this is the simplest one as a start. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On a different topic, a while ago I suggested that we move the > 2.0 > > > > > > > > branch to HEAD -- any BTI maintainers still up for it? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Sean Qiu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sean Qiu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sean Qiu > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean Qiu > > > -- Sean Qiu China Software Development Lab, IBM