harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][M3] release notes
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:35:33 GMT
2007/9/28, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> > Yep, just the link to JIRA query would be the best.
> > Though I'm also not sure Web UI allows this, unless a project uses
> > "Due date" feature which Harmony does not.
>
> Well we can approximate it by querying the issues that were
> resolved/closed between the date of M2 and the date of M3.
>
> The problem being that it will include issues that are not part of the
> release per se (such as website updates):
We can select the components we are interested in. And remove
"Website/Documentation" component for example...

SY, Alexey


>
> e.g.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310050&updated%3Abefore=28%2FSep%2F07&updated%3Aafter=1%2FMay%2F07&status=5&status=6&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> > 2007/9/28, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com>:
> >> Yes - I wasn't thinking that we would publish the whole list, I was just
> >> wondering if it was possible to do that kind of query in JIRA, and if so, if
> >> we could include a link to JIRA from the release notes that does the query
> >> for you.  Does that make sense?  So you click on the link and you get a JIRA
> >> search page up with the list of all the bugs fixed in M3. I know you can do
> >> it in Bugzilla but it may not be possible in JIRA (I couldn't find out how
> >> this morning).
> >>
> >> Otherwise (or additionally) I do think including a short list of the most
> >> important ones as you suggested would be a good idea.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Sian
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28/09/2007, Nadya Morozova <nad.morozova@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> Generally, i think it is a good idea to include fixed bugs (as well as
> >>> unfixed critical bugs) into release notes. however, i don't think we need
> >>> to
> >>> publish them all. those interested can always query JIRA manually, while
> >>> those not particularly interested will get a longish table of info they
> >>> don't need.
> >>> we could perhaps select the most outstanding bugs and the bugs that were
> >>> in
> >>> known issues in M2 and are fixed in M3. what do you say?
> >>>
> >>> On 9/28/07, Sian January <sianjanuary@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>> I'm not sure if JIRA supports this kind of query, but if it does, would
> >>> it
> >>>> be good to include a link in the release notes to a list of all the
> >>> JIRAs
> >>>> that have been fixed for M3?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 27/09/2007, Nadya Morozova <nad.morozova@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>> as we're nearing the closure time for M3 snapshot, I thought it
would
> >>> be
> >>>>> great if we started writing Release Notes for them. We managed to
do
> >>>> that
> >>>>> for our previous milestone M2 [1], but failed to do it on time to
ship
> >>>>> with
> >>>>> the bundle. Let's do better this time. For convenience, I've created
a
> >>>>> Wiki
> >>>>> page [2] to gather all things that are unlikely to be fixed before
M3
> >>> or
> >>>>> are
> >>>>> otherwise notable and should be in the Release Notes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I hope this way works for you. You're welcome to enter whatever
notes
> >>>> you
> >>>>> have, and I will assembly them into an HTML page and into
> >>> site-specific
> >>>>> XML
> >>>>> in time for the final snapshot. Surely, an engineering review and
> >>>> sign-off
> >>>>> from committers would be necessary before packaging the final version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>> http://harmony.apache.org/documentation/milestones/m2-relnotes.html
> >>>>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Milestone_M3_known_issues
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Nadya
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
> >>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> >>>> 741598.
> >>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> >>> 3AU
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Nadya
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Unless stated otherwise above:
> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> >> 741598.
> >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
> >>
> >
>

Mime
View raw message