harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Zakharov" <alexei.zakha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][sound] Proposal on sound module integration
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:45:44 GMT

Did I understand correctly that Tritonus has some benefits if compared
with PortAduio? Or is it some other kind of provider? Just like to say
that if PortAudio covers all three platforms - *NIX, Windows and MacOS
- why should we have something special on Linux?


2007/9/12, Jimmy,Jing Lv <firepure@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>     Thanks to Matthias and Florian, now we have java sound
> implmentation. However, we still need to integrate it into Harmony.
>      What's more,  Tritonus lacks native support for windows and
> MacOS. As I list before, a cross-platform sound API PortAudio[1] may
> meet the request. I've post a mail on their mailing-list and wait for
> the author/administrator reply. The PortAudio is BSD-like licensed, so
> I don't think it'll be big problem on license. And discussion on
> PortAudio mailing-list shows that it may remain some bugs and some
> thread-safe issues.
>      So the remaining work is
> 1. wait for Tritonus to re-licensed and merge it into Harmony
> 2. modify PortAudio to support java-sound implementation on windows and MacOs
> 3. fix bugs/thread-safes issues if any of Tritonus/PortAudio, and
> complete test-coverage. And re-contribute to Tritonus/PortAudio if
> possible.
>      And comments/suggestions? Thanks!
> [1] www.portaudio.com
> --
> Best Regards!
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM

View raw message