Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.162.232 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=MC+WL9YgBaLqKssVfOZLcEOm9rQ3qpVSCKJEjR2ioq7sOtqss+EMz64s+fFCmfgLb0ZBTE8rcKG0fs8XQEyEjRUtfPSrEt5ZhITdPlJ5i3A7eiu9LJZydxBBzUr28VoLXwTaaA39P8QGeQlAEsQzMIYoRHpXZCK9M8m6itIjUA0=
Message-ID: <f944d83d0708230502p6bf8be86l6bfb9808c14dcb94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:02:54 +0700
From: "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [buildtest] A new adaptor to integrate junit's tests into BTI 2.0
In-Reply-To: <94d710af0708212001u58a75d49sbb06d17feb9ab5e8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <94d710af0708152207u94df25cy92295534e5169365@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46CB4D0F.6080401@gmail.com>
	 <94d710af0708212001u58a75d49sbb06d17feb9ab5e8@mail.gmail.com>

Sean,

Nice work - I've integrated this JIRA into SVN. I'm curious what is
next - TestNG, JMock, Mauve?
BTW, recalling the XMLReporter issue with Mauve, you can simply
contact their developers and ask for this feature or even provide
ready-to-commit patch. I think it is the best solution.
Good luck, and looking forward for the new adapters!

2007/8/22, Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com>:
> 2007/8/22, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Sean Qiu wrote:
> > > Hi, guys
> > >
> > > I have wrote a new adaptor to integrate junit's tests into BTI 2.0.
> > > Could someone pls try this patch [1] ?  Thanks.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4637
> >
> > I wouldn't know Sean, but hopefully the BTI gurus can comment.  I took a
> > look at the files and it seems remarkably simple to incorporate JUnit's
> > test suites if that is all that is required.
>
>
>  Yes , i am going to add some other test suites into our BTI.
> And this is the simplest one as a start.
>
> On a different topic, a while ago I suggested that we move the 2.0
> > branch to HEAD -- any BTI maintainers still up for it?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean Qiu
>