Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gshimansky@gmail.com designates
 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;
        b=DH8b7u+MvvC594yMpwcGxbr/Pq3yIaRgTYEZhNzeWZnK9kuyRPXfUgYpAY6Uv3t3FY+plwLVGP92eBrS1Unq7gCcdt6TL46IWVnBRLwXLyBcWETRxWorhyGf0XVDb2xjtWxXMnoJk67+YHGOufqueWYR01ixD6xWqsJDso0Gz1M=
Message-ID: <208da7a50708230405q1f2fbea8sa062296cee011d54@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:05:05 +0400
From: "Gregory Shimansky" <gshimansky@apache.org>
Sender: gshimansky@gmail.com
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [packaging] binary Gentoo/x86 ebuild for M2 snapshot
In-Reply-To: <faja04$ckl$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_159443_27024243.1187867105082"
References: <fahl51$gqo$2@sea.gmane.org> <46CC67FC.7090607@gmail.com>
	 <faja04$ckl$1@sea.gmane.org>

------=_Part_159443_27024243.1187867105082
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/23/07, Salikh Zakirov <salikh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> > I can put ebuild file somewhere on the site. We just need to decide
> > which section should have the link to it. Probably besides the snapshots
> > for M2?
>
> I remembered a better place, wiki. So I created the wiki page with
> instructions
> and attached the ebuild files to it.
>
>     http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/GentooEbuilds
>
> I agree that it would be a good idea to add a 'packaged distributions'
> link to the site,
> and don't forget to link the .deb files produced by Mark


I might have missed it. Are they already available somewhere?

> Yes, I think so. Is it possible to create a ebuild for JDK as well?
>
> I guess so, using the HDK download for it.


There are two different binaries on the site, JDK and HDK.

>> 4) Gentoo is not keen to have a version identifier 'M2', so I changed
> >> it to '0.02'. It would be nice
> >> if our release numbering would be compatible with packaging systems
> >> without such changes,
> >> to reduce confusion.
> >
> > It could be harmony-jre-bin-0.0-r2.ebuild probably? We didn't agree on
> > any version number yet :)
>
> I think that will be misleading, as M2 is a version related to the Harmony
> project,
> rather than the ebuild version.
>

I thought of a different versioning scheme. A date could be used as a
postfix of the version, e.g. 0.0.20070832, or the date of the M2 milestone.
For example some gcc ebuilds use date when a CVS snapshot is used instead of
an official release.

BTW I didn't find an official document for the ebuild file name format. Do
you know if one exist?

-- 
Gregory

------=_Part_159443_27024243.1187867105082--