harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sean Qiu" <sean.xx....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib] Code coverage
Date Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:27:44 GMT
2007/8/22, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>:

> Rui Hu wrote:
> > I've shared the coverage report in HARMONY-4665. Anyone can download it
> to
> > see the coverage details. Thanks.
> > The customized EMMA and usage will be shared later.
>
> Thanks Robert.  I have uploaded your reports here temporarily so people
> can see them easily:
>
>    http://people.apache.org/~tellison/emma/
>
> The obvious things that jump out are:
> - big blocks of 0% coverage where we have dependencies from other
>   projects, that are already tested, e.g. XML and ORB.
> - some areas are amazingly high, over 90% block coverage! e.g. NIO,
>   Logging, JNDI.
> - a few areas that could do with a boost, e.g. RMI


For the RMI, maybe we can write a scenario test in our BTI.
Because the the test need a available server to interact.

And i will try to add some junit test for it at the same time.

> Overall very impressive though.  I wonder what the summary numbers would
> be without the JMX, ORB, etc things that we get from elsewhere.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>


-- 
Sean Qiu

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message